Living well with a misdiagnosis: abstract

This is a continuation of the last post, which presented the RESULTS section of this article, as Table 1. This is the Abstract.

Living Well With (a Misdiagnosis of) Parkinson’s Disease

ABSTRACT

GOAL:

To review research related to

· Difficulty of diagnosis among and between movement disorders,

· Factors leading to misdiagnosis,
and

· Quality of Life issues experienced

BACKGROUND:

Single Subject Case Study of a 76 year old male. First reported Essential Tremor (ET) symptoms dating to teenage years. ET became disabling after five decades. ET refractory to treatment by a neurologist. Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) chosen by subject as a last resort. Prior to DBS implants, a diagnosis of Parkinson’s Disease (PD) was made, due to rigidity observed A DATScan performed seven years after diagnosis reportedly showed abnormal dopamine transport..

Thirteen years after PD diagnosis, subject relocated and was referred to a Movement Disorders Specialist (MDS). On examination, no PD symptoms were observed. MDS began differential diagnosis based on symptoms of tremors, fatigue, and gait abnormality.

At this time, it appears that the subject’s initial presentation and diagnosis of ET (in 2010) was accurate. The later diagnosis of PD was vulnerable to confirmation bias, apparently the neurologist treating for ET had identified gait abnormality as rigidity, and failed to rule out other possible causes for arm swing asymmetry (Navarro-López et al., 2022). Heterogeneity of tremors (Fekete & Li, 2013) apparently was not investigated. Interestingly, in one of the case studies reported by Fekete & Li, a patient had been diagnosed as PD by a different neurologist, and was later determined to have ET without concurrent PD. It is not lost on this author that the references noted are later than the misdiagnosis (in December 2011). “If I knew then what I know now…”

METHODS:

Review of research articles available on PubMed Center relevant to

· Diagnostic criteria,

· Prodromal symptoms,

· Accuracy of diagnoses,

· Differentiating symptoms between ET, ET and PD, and PD.

In addition, discussion includes observable and subjective data regarding subject’s

Quality of life (QOL), including but not limited to:

· Side effects of medications,

· Dosages of medications,

· costs of medications

· Impacts of side effects, dosage, and costs for unnecessary medical interventions on other aspects of individual and social quality of life.

· Factors related to diagnosis and misdiagnosis.

Next: Quality of Life and Factors Affecting Misdiagnosis

###

A review on dance and PD

Dance classes for Parkinson’s patients was one of the things that got me involved in Power for Parkinson’s© and the Georgetown Area Parkinson’s Support group to begin with. For me, it has helped to improve symptoms and quality of life tremendously.

In this desk review of many studies, the authors came to the following conclusions:

Overall, the reviewed evidence demonstrated that dance can improve motor impairments, specifically balance and motor symptom severity in individuals with mild to moderate PD, and that more research is needed to determine its effects on non-motor symptoms and QOL. RCTs that use a mixed-methods approach and include larger sample sizes will be beneficial in fully characterizing effects and in determining which program elements are most important in bringing about positive, clinically meaningful changes in people with PD.

 Carapellotti AM, Stevenson R, Doumas M (2020) The efficacy of dance for improving motor impairments, non-motor symptoms, and quality of life in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 15(8): e0236820. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236820

I have come to the conclusion that every study or review has to include the phrase “more research is needed.” And it is true.

You can read the article in its entirety at the URL in the citation, or download it directly from this link:

The efficacy of dance for improving motor impairments, non-motor symptoms, and quality of life in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

 

That famous essay

 

James Parkinson wrote an essay on “The Shaking Palsy” just over 200 years ago. Although science doesn’t stand still, and folks like Louis Pasteur, Alexander Fleming, and Jonas Salk came along to make important contributions in medical science, the field of Movement Disorders has, until recently, relied almost exclusively on the traits described by Parkinson in his essay to diagnose the disease. French neurologist Jean-Martin Charcot made some advances in making distinctions between some of the symptoms and championed naming the disease after Dr.Parkinson.

Curious about the essay itself? it’s available online as a full access article in The Journal of Neuropsychiatry (downloadable as a PDF file.

An essay on the Shaking Palsy 

An Essay on the Shaking Palsy, by James Parkinson, was originally published as a monograph by Sherwood, Neely, and Jones (London, 1817). Punctuation and spelling follow the original text. Introduction Copyright © 2002 American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.