This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis. Like many such desk reviews and meta-analyses, it winds up, in layperson’s terminology, comparing apples and oranges and pears and papayas and tangerines and dragon fruit and kiwis to each other. Treatments included “multimodal, aerobic, resistance, dance, conventional physical therapy and other types.” Five studies apparently were vulnerable to bias (in favor of the treatment being studied, one would suppose). They did conclude that, after sifting the studies down to eight, that aerobic exercise had a stronger effect than conventional exercise on non-motor symptoms. This is in conformance with other reviews that I have read (or read the abstracts of) in the past.
And then we have this study, which might have been kicked out due to possibility of bias, or maybe it wasn’t published early enough to be included.
Physical activity based on dance movements as complementary therapy for Parkinson’s disease: Effects on movement, executive functions, depressive symptoms, and quality of life
Duarte JdS, Alcantara WA, Brito JS, Barbosa LCS, Machado IPR, et al. (2023) Physical activity based on dance movements as complementary therapy for Parkinson’s disease: Effects on movement, executive functions, depressive symptoms, and quality of life. PLOS ONE 18(2): e0281204. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281204
Methods used were described as follows:
13 individuals with PD (Hoehn & Yahr I-III, MDS-UPDRS 67.62 ± 20.83), underwent physical activity based on dance movements (2x week for 6 months). Participants were assessed at baseline and after 6 months on movement (POMA, TUG and MDS-UPDRS Part III), executive function (FAB), depressive symptoms (MADRS), quality of life (PDQ-39), and severity of PD (MDS-UPDRS TOTAL).
The results were:
significant improvement in the movement (balance and gait) by the POMA test, p = 0.0207, executive function by the FAB test, p = 0.0074, abstract reasoning and inhibitory control by the FAB, Conceptualization test, p = 0.0062, and Inhibitory Control, p = 0.0064, depressive symptoms assessed by the MADRS test significantly reduced, p = 0.0214, and the quality of life by the PDQ-39 had a significant increase after the intervention, p = 0.0006, showed significant improvements between the pre-and post-intervention periods of physical activity based on dance movements.
The conclusions were obvious:
Physical activity based on dance movements contributed to significant improvements in movement (balance and gait), executive functions, especially in cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control, and the quality of life too. Sensorimotor integration, most cognitive processing and social skills may have contributed to the results.
Personally, I have to wonder whether inhibitory control and executive functions apply to my individual results, based on feedback from others, but it could be that I just need to keep on dancing more and worry less about what other folks think.
For nerds like myself, clicking on the following link will get you a list of similar articles published within the past five years (2019 – 2024) available with free full text.
So, to reiterate the title of this post:
bob's brain: living well with a movement disorder and other comorbidities 